The Chainlink

Folks,

 

The Chicago Department of Transportation recently put out a Request for Proposals for the creation of a full-scale bike share system that could bring as many as 5,000 public bikes to Chicago by the end of 2014. Today on Grid Chicago Steven Vance examines the RFP and explains what this large-scale bike share system might look like.

 

Keep moving forward,

 

John Greenfield

 



Views: 1040

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I like the idea but those things are huge,heavy and usually wobbly people on the sidewalk riding them.

 

THIS is where the bike ambassadors could be telling newbies the rules of the road.

Ever ridden one? I think bike sharing bikes are a very fun (albeit slow) ride, especially in a town with almost no hills.

Part of the current problem is that they're mostly focused on tourist riders, with little for residents. Having people who are both new to cycling and new to the city is always a dangerous combination.  Putting signs up letting people know sidewalk riding isn't permitted and a map showing the bike routes in the 4-8 block radius of the station would be a nice addition. 

 

In Barcelona there are stations all over the city and its really useful to ride from one destination to another.  

 

I love that the membership cards will be incorporated into CTA fare cards. 

Mike Zumwalt said:

I like the idea but those things are huge,heavy and usually wobbly people on the sidewalk riding them.

 

THIS is where the bike ambassadors could be telling newbies the rules of the road.

Perhaps CDOT could post basic rules of the road, such as riding with traffic and staying off sidewalks, at each rental site.

 

I can tell you what it might "look" like on the lake front path and its not pretty.

What will it look like? The city will be flooded with normal people riding wobbly on heavy bikes, reclaiming the streets. This will make bicycling more widespread, visible, mainstream. It will calm traffic because it's easy for a car driver to pretend one cyclist doesn't exist, but it's harder to ignore a dozen of them. James Schwartz in Toronto wrote a great post on this on The Urban Country Bicycle Blog:

 

One of the arguments against bike sharing schemes is that they will flood our streets with inexperienced cyclists causing collisions with automobiles and wreaking havoc on our streets.

In reality, the effect is the opposite. More bicycles = more cautious drivers. Inexperienced cyclists create a calming effect on our drivers. And if that’s what it takes to slow down automobiles in our city, then great - because road engineers aren’t doing much to slow down traffic at the moment.

I say bring on the havoc. Bring on the wobbly cyclists.

Perhaps I should have written that the winning RFP respondent's bike sharing system may be nothing like B-Cycle. B-Cycle is certainly entitled to submit a proposal for this RFP, but six companies bid for the bike sharing system in New York City, and the same six could submit proposals here. 

The winner was Alta Bicycle Share, which operates the Washington, D.C., Capital Bikeshare program. B-Cycle was also on the two-company shortlist for NYC. I don't know who the other four companies were. 

In the proposal, Commissioner Gabe Klein and managing deputy commissioner Scott Kubly, the pair who launched Capital Bikeshare, envision three types of bicycle trips with the bike sharing system:

  • Regular trips for work, school, shopping, etc., taken by subscribers.

  • Spur of the moment trips taken by irregular users and subscribers.

  • Trips taken by visitors to Chicago. 

Take this into consideration before you imagine the craziness of the Lakefront Trail making its way to the streets of Chicago. A bike sharing system has great potential to bring out people who want to bike but don't want to own a bike, don't want to buy a bike, or can't or don't know how to take care of a bike. It's like ZipCar and I-GO - "wheels when you want them".

Photos of Parisians riding bike share bikes:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/16nine/2489316576/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/16nine/2488499065/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/16nine/4014167000/

Thank god.

Steven Vance said:

Perhaps I should have written that the winning RFP respondent's bike sharing system may be nothing like B-Cycle.

I find the quote below from Vance's earlier post interesting.  As a driver's license is required to operate a ZipCar, one presumes the renter of the vehicle already knows how to drive.  However a bike sharing individual has no such requirement, therefore may have never ridden a bicycle in their life before.  I am generally 'for' the program but I expect some growing pains. 

 

My understanding from a doctor who lived in Montreal when their bike sharing program exploded is that their city had a huge spike in emergency room visits following the mushroom growth of bikes available to share.  Is Chicago going to keep metrics on this when we institute our program?

 

<per Steven Vance post above>

"A bike sharing system has great potential to bring out people who want to bike but don't want to own a bike, don't want to buy a bike, or can't or don't know how to take care of a bike. It's like ZipCar and I-GO - "wheels when you want them"."

The city would look a little more like Paris, Live S. Vance says.  They are all over the place over there and it seems to work just fine.

 

Of course, here in Chicago there would be an adjustment period, perhaps with some significant problems, but adjustment is going to happen anyway with the current explosion of bike commuters.

I wrote a post about Bike Share, and my one unique idea is this:

People should not be encouraged (or allowed) to use the bike shares to commute from the hoods into downtown. Either get a bike of your own or take the train. 

But for business people to get around downtown, the system would be great. With a few infrastructure improvements--bike/bus share lanes, maybe a couple protected lanes--it would be relatively easy to navigate across the loop.

So users should either be disallowed from depositing bikes downtown or there should be a surcharge if you want to use it to commute. 

Or just start with a really viable system downtown and branch out from there. Much of the rest of Chicago is just too spread out.

"Bring on the havoc."

I know there's an ongoing debate about the necessity of helmets, but I can't help but think that most of the presumably inexperienced users of these bikes would not be wearing them while darting in and out of downtown daytime traffic.

RSS

© 2008-2016   The Chainlink Community, L.L.C.   Powered by

Disclaimer  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service