The Chainlink

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/ct-perspec-0719-biking-2...

 

Crazed cyclists run rampant

Enforce existing bike laws to collect needed revenue

  • By John D. Thomas

My wife and I love Chicago, and we are always thinking about ways that might improve the city. Lately, we came up with an idea that would not only make where we live safer and less stressful but also could substantially fill our depleted municipal coffers. And, best of all, getting it done would merely require enforcing regulations that are already on the books.

What's our plan? Start fining the heck out of the city's insane number of crazed bike riders.

Now don't get me wrong: I do not hate on cyclists. Actually, quite the opposite.

In 1979, when I saw the amazing cycling-coming-of-age film "Breaking Away," I became a lifelong fan of the sport. The movie inspired me to pedal my bike across Florida and Iowa in group tours when I was in my early teens; when I was in college, I dabbled in both road- and mountain-bike racing. I also love to sit for hours watching long stages of theTour de France,which is currently taking place.

I have ridden a bike literally thousands and thousands of miles. That much time in the saddle taught me a lot about how to coexist and respect people driving in cars and to expect them to respect me as well.

All of which makes me very attuned to the driving patterns of Chicago cyclists. And I must say, for the most part they are simply awful. It would not be an exaggeration to say that on an average outing in our car to run a few errands, my wife and I see at least half a dozen egregious driving infractions by cyclists.

They range from blithely running through red lights and stop signs to passing on our right just as we are about to turn. And if we ever yell out a complaint about their poor understanding of the rules of the road, we almost always get that sickeningly smug grin that implies that pedal power trumps a gas guzzler every time, no matter what a bike rider does.

In my experience talking with Chicago bike riders, I get the sense that most believe that our traffic laws do not apply to them. Nothing could be less true and, in fact, the part of the Chicago Municipal Code related to riding bicycles is more than 4,000 words long.

This is my favorite portion of the code, and it is a rule that, if vigorously enforced, would give Chicago an enormous budget surplus:

"(c) Whenever authorized signs are erected indicating that no right or left turn or turn in the opposite direction is permitted, no person operating a bicycle shall disobey the direction of any such sign unless he dismounts from the bicycle to make the turn, in which event he shall then obey the regulations applicable to pedestrians."

"(d) Every person convicted of a violation of any provision of this chapter regulating bicycles shall be fined $25.00."

However, not only have I seen literally hundreds of people on bikes pay absolutely no attention to those kinds of road signs, I have also never seen a Chicago cop giving a cyclist a ticket. And, yes, I have been in many, many situations where I have seen police officers witness horrendous and dangerous bike riding and do nothing about it.

In my mind, all great cities embrace cyclists, and more Chicagoans are biking on our city streets all the time. And while bike lanes and more places to park and lock your bike are great advancements, if the people riding bikes don't do so with a sense of common sense and safety, then what will develop is a vicious car-versus-bike climate that will only end up creating chaos and accidents.

Chicago writer John D. Thomas is currently finishing a book on the cultural history of saliva.

Views: 3769

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

another failed piece written by a person that fails to really understand urban cycling.

Duppie re Mrs Doubfire comment, got a literal lol and a few curious glances from my coffee house crowd. well done.

I cannot believe that in all these posts only two people have really picked up some of the little things in this that hint that while the author may not hate bikes he sure as heck does not ride them on a regular basis. 

He used to race bikes, he rode across states as a teen, he likes to watch bike races, he has ridden thousands of miles in his life and he runs errands in his car.  Also notice that he refers to cyclists as driving, not riding, their bike. Does any of this sound like he is a regular rider now?  No, not at all, not even in the slightest.  What it does sound like is that he is a regular driver who is frustrated with seeing people on bikes get around easier than he does.

I ride my bike every day for everything I do and range far and wide across the city.  I think that this makes me more aware of the behavior of cyclists than the average motorist because I am more attuned to seeing bikes.  In my travels I think I see far more people riding responsibly, maybe not to the letter of the law but in a safe manner, than I see riding like idiots.  In my experience from when I both drove and rode is the same but when I was only a driver it seemed to me that every cyclist I saw was a nut job out to kill themselves.  That means that either when I decided to start riding a bike all the cyclists in Chicago decided to start riding smarter or it was a matter of my perception being skewed because you notice different things under different conditions.

Sarah D. said:

Agreed. Once folks like this spend significant time cycling in the city, now, then they'll see how utterly car-centric our streets, traffic lights/signage/rules, and intersections are. It's impossible to use a bike for transport in this city (and likely others) legally while staying alive and safe. I would love to educate non-cyclists on each hot-button issue/situation they don't understand in a constructive way with a bike's eye view IMAX film. Think they'd come see it?

Nah.



Michelle Stenzel said:

In 1979, when I saw the amazing cycling-coming-of-age film "Breaking Away," I became a lifelong fan of the sport. The movie inspired me to pedal my bike across Florida and Iowa in group tours when I was in my early teens; when I was in college, I dabbled in both road- and mountain-bike racing. I also love to sit for hours watching long stages of theTour de France,which is currently taking place.

 

That paragraph speaks volumes. He's viewing riding a bicycle as a sport, not as transportation. His experience on a bike seems to be from decades ago, on long-distance group rides and mountain bike racing. He talks about running errands with his wife in his car more recently, and never mentions riding a bicycle in the city at all. I'd like to invite him and his wife to turn off the Tour de France coverage and ride their bikes around their city neighborhood, to go shopping or out to dinner, and then ask him about his impressions and opinions again.

 

speaking of....

 

there was a town hall style meeting once aired on PBS about the economy... and Wm F. Buckley

was the moderator; a lady from the audience stood and stated :

 

"I really don't know anything about economics...but I really think the minimum wage needs to be raised"

 

Mr. Buckley quickly retorted : "Madame...please sit down and be quiet. You see...the second part of your comment confirms the first".

 

 



Duppie said:

Talk about not understanding economics...

I am going to be generous and assume that there are a 100,000 people riding a bike every day in Chicago. That means that each one of them needs to get 261 tickets every year to bring the $631M budget deficit (2011 numbers) back to zero.

Does he really think it is possible to write 26,000,000 tickets a year?

I for one am glad I am not taking English classes at Columbia...



Liz said:

I will say that the author has very poor writing skills, doesn't understand economics, and instead of making a clear, level headed argument simply whines about things he doesn't like.  

The article is poorly written and the headline is meant to be sensational

The way I see it he called her out on making what is a common, and mind numbingly ignorant, type of comment.  To confirm a lack of knowledge on a subject and then offer an opinion on it is about as dumb as it gets.



Daniel G said:

So the classiest known conservative told a woman to sit down and shut up at a town hall meeting? She's lucky it was televised, at least she got a dickish, smarmy retort in response to her softball set-up, instead of "Security!".

Not sure it's that black and white. How much knowledge of a given topic does one need to have before one can be considered qualified to offer an opinion? Clearly if she knows what "minimum wage" is, then her statement that she knows "nothing" about economics isn't completely true.

Funny how there's not a lick of mention of this quote to be found anywhere on the 'nets. A Chainlink exclusive!

notoriousDUG said:

The way I see it he called her out on making what is a common, and mind numbingly ignorant, type of comment.  To confirm a lack of knowledge on a subject and then offer an opinion on it is about as dumb as it gets.



Daniel G said:

So the classiest known conservative told a woman to sit down and shut up at a town hall meeting? She's lucky it was televised, at least she got a dickish, smarmy retort in response to her softball set-up, instead of "Security!".

Off topic but I believe she was suggesting a raise in the minimum wage but clarified that she's not approaching it from the perspective of an economist.


notoriousDUG said:

The way I see it he called her out on making what is a common, and mind numbingly ignorant, type of comment.  To confirm a lack of knowledge on a subject and then offer an opinion on it is about as dumb as it gets.



Daniel G said:

So the classiest known conservative told a woman to sit down and shut up at a town hall meeting? She's lucky it was televised, at least she got a dickish, smarmy retort in response to her softball set-up, instead of "Security!".

I agree with Cameron's posts taking issue more with the Tribune than the writer. I agree the writer has an awkward I'm a cyclist but don't like cyclists attitude.  Yet, we have all been confronted with douchebags on the road and have all had an adverse reaction to them.  My problem is with the Tribune which seems intent on putting out the message that there is a culture of lawlessness amongst cyclists.  I have resisted saying this in the past when there has been discussion on other threads about cyclists killed on the road. I am beginning to doubt myself in that regard.  The paper can chose which pieces to publish. Why this one?  Its not newsworthy. He says nothing new.  He whines about cyclists who ignore the rules of the road.  I have seen whining about cars doing the same on the Chainlink. Nothing new.  My personal rant is with pedestrians who walk like lemmings obliviious to traffic signals. So what?  Most cyclsits pay attention. Some don't . Same for cars.  We all read about a tragedy in Colorado this morning.  The reaction is to fret that society is in decay.  Most people have humanity and care about others.  That guy did not. "I've seen a lot of..." is not social science or statistically significant or newsworthy. Its rantworthy and that's the crap that was published in the paper.  It was not even a well written personal essay.  He got it off his chest. Good for him.  Then again, why do th editors publish this stuff.  There are a handful of writers at the paper who have covered cycling and have painted a different picture. We don't see much of their stuff these days.  Of course, I will admit that much of my rant ( I guess I am no different) has to do with my issues with Tribune editorial policy in general. Most of my friends have stopped receiving the paper as the paper's editorial policy regarding teachers, unions and injured workers...and  now cyclists is intolerable.  I feel I must  support a newspaper in a world where newspapers keep going out of  business and keep my subscription. I am a fool.

Well said, Dave!  I absolute agree with you - except the part about continuing to support the Trib.  I feel I must support a newspaper, but not this one.  Crap like this is only one of many reasons I dropped them.  I support a neighborhood paper and get an online NY Times subscription instead. 

I wish I could still support the Trib, because I like the idea of having major daily newspapers in our town.  It's unfortunate that they've chosen a dubious path that's become unacceptable to too many of us.

Has anyone considered writing a op/ed rebuttal?

In fairness economics is a field largely filled with people who don't know what they're talking about.

Do people really call Buckley the classiest conservative? Was this before or after he called Gore Vidal a queer on national television

Matt Tennessen said:

Off topic but I believe she was suggesting a raise in the minimum wage but clarified that she's not approaching it from the perspective of an economist.

Fair weather CYCLIST? ranting on behalf of those frowny faced cagers as I take the bike line on Wells st. passing me by on my left with thier nodding noggins of disapproval.

I was disappointing, I thought Crazed Cyclists Run Rampant was going to be a sexy exploitation movie.

RSS

© 2008-2016   The Chainlink Community, L.L.C.   Powered by

Disclaimer  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service