"Except you are, because you kicked out the person complaining about it and kept the person who doxxed her for it.
This is conveying clearly what behavior is regarded as appropriate vs what is inappropriate.
"Protecting the use of slurs and exiling people who have a problem with it, while sanctioning the doxxing of the people who raise those concerns, is in fact the opposite of maintaining an open forum for people of diverse backgrounds.
"Hhhhyup same shit as always. This'll go nicely alongside the insane graphs of associations a bunch of neckbeards are passing around to make Anita Sarkeesian's critiques of sexism in video games an elaborate conspiracy. "
"If it is her method, and not her content which is the problem, then what does it say that the methods of deliberately antagonizing someone and posting her pictures are considered just fine. What order are you maintaining.
"One side of this had the temerity to raise her concerns and mean it and not be pushed away by the immediate invective the mere suggestion will always, always provoke. The other side is: Just Fine.
The mod actions defended one over the other.…"
"As an aside, I've been on another forum for a number of years which opted to employ word filters for slurs, such as:
the spice mines of kessel
fully armed and operational battlestation
eclipse-class star destroyer
"That's the trouble with the free speech banner, she was exercising her speech too. So there's basically no avoiding making a decision as to what speech is acceptable and what is not, and in a very practical sense total non-intervention…"
"Well now we do know where we stand. We have established that we are an online community that will people who highlight the use of alienating language in order to protect people who bully them out of the community. How do you feel about…"