The Chainlink

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/ct-perspec-0719-biking-2...

 

Crazed cyclists run rampant

Enforce existing bike laws to collect needed revenue

  • By John D. Thomas

My wife and I love Chicago, and we are always thinking about ways that might improve the city. Lately, we came up with an idea that would not only make where we live safer and less stressful but also could substantially fill our depleted municipal coffers. And, best of all, getting it done would merely require enforcing regulations that are already on the books.

What's our plan? Start fining the heck out of the city's insane number of crazed bike riders.

Now don't get me wrong: I do not hate on cyclists. Actually, quite the opposite.

In 1979, when I saw the amazing cycling-coming-of-age film "Breaking Away," I became a lifelong fan of the sport. The movie inspired me to pedal my bike across Florida and Iowa in group tours when I was in my early teens; when I was in college, I dabbled in both road- and mountain-bike racing. I also love to sit for hours watching long stages of theTour de France,which is currently taking place.

I have ridden a bike literally thousands and thousands of miles. That much time in the saddle taught me a lot about how to coexist and respect people driving in cars and to expect them to respect me as well.

All of which makes me very attuned to the driving patterns of Chicago cyclists. And I must say, for the most part they are simply awful. It would not be an exaggeration to say that on an average outing in our car to run a few errands, my wife and I see at least half a dozen egregious driving infractions by cyclists.

They range from blithely running through red lights and stop signs to passing on our right just as we are about to turn. And if we ever yell out a complaint about their poor understanding of the rules of the road, we almost always get that sickeningly smug grin that implies that pedal power trumps a gas guzzler every time, no matter what a bike rider does.

In my experience talking with Chicago bike riders, I get the sense that most believe that our traffic laws do not apply to them. Nothing could be less true and, in fact, the part of the Chicago Municipal Code related to riding bicycles is more than 4,000 words long.

This is my favorite portion of the code, and it is a rule that, if vigorously enforced, would give Chicago an enormous budget surplus:

"(c) Whenever authorized signs are erected indicating that no right or left turn or turn in the opposite direction is permitted, no person operating a bicycle shall disobey the direction of any such sign unless he dismounts from the bicycle to make the turn, in which event he shall then obey the regulations applicable to pedestrians."

"(d) Every person convicted of a violation of any provision of this chapter regulating bicycles shall be fined $25.00."

However, not only have I seen literally hundreds of people on bikes pay absolutely no attention to those kinds of road signs, I have also never seen a Chicago cop giving a cyclist a ticket. And, yes, I have been in many, many situations where I have seen police officers witness horrendous and dangerous bike riding and do nothing about it.

In my mind, all great cities embrace cyclists, and more Chicagoans are biking on our city streets all the time. And while bike lanes and more places to park and lock your bike are great advancements, if the people riding bikes don't do so with a sense of common sense and safety, then what will develop is a vicious car-versus-bike climate that will only end up creating chaos and accidents.

Chicago writer John D. Thomas is currently finishing a book on the cultural history of saliva.

Views: 3276

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Since the point was to get people to buckle up, the sign did work. They can probably run one with just the sign periodically and save police time.



S said:

yet another ground breaking piece of journalism compliments of the bankrupt trib

Ghostery does wonders for my blood pressure by blocking the comments section from appearing.

Yeah for Ghostery!

+1 for the scofflaw link.  Anyone who pulls up in their gigantic SUV and gets six inches away to complain about my rolling through a stop sign is missing the point. 

James BlackHeron said:

The Myth of the scofflaw cyclist.

This guy says he's a cyclist.  If he were a cyclist he'd be running those errands on his bicycle.  

My opinion is that the city needs to start giving out "Low Emissions Vehicle" license plates to vehicles that get something like 50MPH or more as a start.  And then begin using blackout dates and times in certain parts of the city where vehicles without said plates are not allowed.  

Then Start turning up the heat every year over the definition of LEV and expanding the blackout times/dates and spreading out the area.

Until that happens I'll just have say that gas isn't expensive enough if this guy and folks like him can simply jump into a car to run some short errands around the city.  

While I don't think he should being singling out cyclists, he does have a point. I actually do wish that more laws where actually enforced, be if for cyclists, motorists or pedestrians.  The rate that ALL 3 violate codes is dangerous. I don't think cyclists should be targeted more heavily than drivers, but it should be targeted at the same rate.  Chicago is pretty bad in terms of compliance for all modes of transportation. 

Things like red light running and riding without lights are not just dangerous to that individual, they're dangerous to the other road users as well.  I've had several times this summer I had been nearly hit on my bike by another cyclist blowing a red light.  This is not someone who approaches an empty intersection, stops than proceeds if its clear, this is someone who just never bothered to slow down, look or yield to others.  While a bike wouldn't do as much damage to me as a car, I'd rather not find out how much damage getting t-boned by a one will do. 

hey 'in it to win it' - this post totally made my day !!!  (the part about my head "spinning"). thanks dude

 

DHB

 



in it to win it said:

A little research on the author:

 

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2010-07-14/news/ct-oped-0714-mug...

 

Book Description

April 16, 2010
The New York Times says the title of "Karaoke of Blood" is in the running for the best of 2011! Playboy says, "It’s a plot that would have Dan Brown’s head spinning." Karaoke of Blood is the story of an aging lounge singer living in Chicago who has a mysterious gift. That gift leads him to be involved in a scheme run by the Catholic church and the mob to raise money to pay for the church's sexual molestation lawsuits. As Tom Waits would say, a lot of girls, a lot of action. The author is the former editor of Playboy.com and contributing editor at Playboy magazine. He has also been a frequent contributor to The New York Times, Playboy magazine, Chicago Tribune and The Village Voice and is an adjunct profesor in the English Department at Columbia College in Chicago.
 

 

http://www.colum.edu/Academics/English_Department/Faculty/Faculty_P...

 

BTW the Kindle book is selling for $1.00...

Every summer the Tribune runs an I'm a cyclist but not that kind of cyclist article like this one. Typically it appears at the beginning of the summer when large numbers of new riders take to the streets, but the early summer this year seems to have caught them off guard. The author seems to be one of their get off my lawn type filler op-ed writers, who over hypes some societal ill and advocates a crackdown to solve the city's budget woes. In the past he's tackled such tough issues as spitting on the sidewalk and the price of gas and candy.

 

I totally agree Liz.  If only enforcement worked -or was even tried...

There was a really interesting segment yesterday on WBEZ about "Why Cars Don't Stop for Pedestrians" and they went into traffic laws/enforcement/attitudes.    What was really intriguing was that laws and even enforcement don't really change behavior.   People only follow the laws (or do anything, for that matter) if they feel it is Worthwhile.    The trick was to convince/educate the scofflaws that what they were doing was not a good idea and that following the laws/rules of the road was actually in everyone's best interests.

They talked about some place in Chile or somewhere in S. America that had horrible driving behaviors.  They actually hired Mimes to lampoon bad drivers and their awful driving behaviors.  And it WORKED!

But be that as it may I think that traffic enforcement hasn't even been tried here.  Autos speed everywhere  and go through stop signs and turn right on red without stopping just as much (if not more) than bikes do. But nothing is done about that.  If you drive the speed limit in this city they will pass you aggressively on the Right in the bike lane or the right-turn only lanes.  If traffic is stopped or going too slow for them they will just pull into the parking or right-turn lane and pass everyone up until the intersection and then drag-race out again to get in front.   

God forbid someone actually STOP for a pedestrian, someone will just race around the stopped car on the right and nearly mow down the peds in the crosswalk as they get near the curb...

They also had a few segments on the "war on cars" and other bike-issues.

I can't find the link to the podcast for this show but it was well worth listening to.

Liz said:

While I don't think he should being singling out cyclists, he does have a point. I actually do wish that more laws where actually enforced, be if for cyclists, motorists or pedestrians.  The rate that ALL 3 violate codes is dangerous. I don't think cyclists should be targeted more heavily than drivers, but it should be targeted at the same rate.  Chicago is pretty bad in terms of compliance for all modes of transportation. 

Things like red light running and riding without lights are not just dangerous to that individual, they're dangerous to the other road users as well.  I've had several times this summer I had been nearly hit on my bike by another cyclist blowing a red light.  This is not someone who approaches an empty intersection, stops than proceeds if its clear, this is someone who just never bothered to slow down, look or yield to others.  While a bike wouldn't do as much damage to me as a car, I'd rather not find out how much damage getting t-boned by a one will do. 

I've always felt that people's choice of travel mode has little impact on the odds that they'll act like an idiot while doing it. There are lots of dangerous behaviors from all types road users, some of which should be cracked down on. However most people will continue to see the "other" types of road users as the source of the problem.



Liz said:

While I don't think he should being singling out cyclists, he does have a point. I actually do wish that more laws where actually enforced, be if for cyclists, motorists or pedestrians.  The rate that ALL 3 violate codes is dangerous. I don't think cyclists should be targeted more heavily than drivers, but it should be targeted at the same rate.  Chicago is pretty bad in terms of compliance for all modes of transportation. 

Things like red light running and riding without lights are not just dangerous to that individual, they're dangerous to the other road users as well.  I've had several times this summer I had been nearly hit on my bike by another cyclist blowing a red light.  This is not someone who approaches an empty intersection, stops than proceeds if its clear, this is someone who just never bothered to slow down, look or yield to others.  While a bike wouldn't do as much damage to me as a car, I'd rather not find out how much damage getting t-boned by a one will do. 

once again, some people do ride bikes for other things then getting groceries

The tour is one of the worlds largest sporting events

I am not trying to start an argument here, but what is wrong with obeying the traffic laws?

I stop for every stop light, every time. I do admit to only yielding the right of way for stop signs

How can we bitch about people parking in bike lanes,being on cell phones and such if we do not follow the same laws?

Disagree. Stating a list of true things in sequence is not the same thing as having a point. Singling out cyclists as the real troublemakers is exactly what negates his point. Practically everyone here acknowledges that a lot of bikers ride like utter shit, and that we all wish everyone were the upstanding citizens of the roadway that we are. Blowing lights without even a sideward glance, salmoning head-on into traffic, night riding unlit. (Of course all of these things risk a fatality for the cyclist and a bumper dent for the driver, but that doesn't actually matter to my point). The point is that in these opinions, the complaints about the actual dangerous things cyclists do are almost always a stand-in/proxy for the safe things we do that inconvenience drivers. Taking the lane when necessary, or riding safely out of the door zone is what really pisses them off because not only do they have to slow down, they could still be held at fault if they're speeding or drinking or on the cell phone and they nudge our rear tires. They know that if we're riding unsafely and breaking the law to do it, they have almost zero risk of liability if something happens. Drivers don't want to nail us because waiting around for the police and being a witness in a trial is a huge hassle, but what they're usually thinking about is how much easier and worry-free driving was before all the fucking cyclists took to the roads.

The not-totally-untrue point of "lots of bicyclists ride like maniacs" is very, very, EXTREMELY well spoken for, which anyone who gets the Trib knows well. Anyone who proceeds to hammer on that point anyway is doing so for a reason other than, "We need safe roads please think of the children *FAINT*". People say things when they say them for a reason. "I'm just sayin' is all" and "I'm just asking questions" are not real reasons to submit an editorial for publishing. The author either actually sees rogue cyclists as the cause of a serious proportion of our traffic ills, or he simply believes that motorists have earned the right to behave antisocially and the cyclists have not. Which is why the article is about us and not about his beloved auto, which takes a son or daughter from 33,000 mothers annually in the us. That stadium full of death has been accounted for and is not the author's problem, but having to wait behind a cyclist is a brand new expense and is totally out of line with what he feels he is entitled to.


Liz said:

While I don't think he should being singling out cyclists, he does have a point. I actually do wish that more laws where actually enforced, be if for cyclists, motorists or pedestrians.  The rate that ALL 3 violate codes is dangerous. I don't think cyclists should be targeted more heavily than drivers, but it should be targeted at the same rate.  Chicago is pretty bad in terms of compliance for all modes of transportation. 

Things like red light running and riding without lights are not just dangerous to that individual, they're dangerous to the other road users as well.  I've had several times this summer I had been nearly hit on my bike by another cyclist blowing a red light.  This is not someone who approaches an empty intersection, stops than proceeds if its clear, this is someone who just never bothered to slow down, look or yield to others.  While a bike wouldn't do as much damage to me as a car, I'd rather not find out how much damage getting t-boned by a one will do. 

I was in the Loop as a pedestrian on Tuesday, and I lost count how many times that a motor vehicle failed to yield to me in the crosswalk with the walk sign going.

I had two people scream at me to "Get out of the F ing way!" I know it's hot and everything but I honestly hoped that I would make it to my meeting without harm. The level of aggression was just amazing. Why are some people out there so angry and aggro?

If anything the car driving is getting worse. Since these are such dire budget times for Chicago and Crook county, I fail to see how the car traffic laws are not enforced. There is a lot more money to be found there.

Agree with the comments above that the author is just trying to get a rise (and resultant page views) for the Chicago Titanic. Good luck with that pay wall.

Reply to Discussion

RSS

© 2008-2013   The Chainlink Community, L.L.C. Julie Hochstadter, Director   Powered by

Disclaimer  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service