The end of Rails-to-Trails? - The Chainlink2024-03-29T07:37:37Zhttps://thechainlink.org/forum/topics/the-end-of-rails-to-trails?feed=yes&xn_auth=noIt really doesn't apply to Il…tag:thechainlink.org,2013-10-26:2211490:Comment:7679352013-10-26T18:25:48.810ZMike Schwabhttps://thechainlink.org/profile/MikeSchwab80
<p>It really doesn't apply to Illinois. Railroad were required actually purchase the land, so when they abandon it, it does not revert and must be sold and titled to the purchasing person.</p>
<p>It really doesn't apply to Illinois. Railroad were required actually purchase the land, so when they abandon it, it does not revert and must be sold and titled to the purchasing person.</p> How incredibly short-sighted…tag:thechainlink.org,2013-10-26:2211490:Comment:7679312013-10-26T17:50:14.509ZBike Blokehttps://thechainlink.org/profile/PaulBacon
<p>How incredibly short-sighted if the SCOTUS rules in favor of the adjacent landowners.</p>
<p>How incredibly short-sighted if the SCOTUS rules in favor of the adjacent landowners.</p> Here is the SCOTUSblog covera…tag:thechainlink.org,2013-10-24:2211490:Comment:7672742013-10-24T01:51:56.188ZTom Dworzanskihttps://thechainlink.org/profile/Tom964
<p>Here is the SCOTUSblog coverage of this case: <a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/marvin-m-brandt-irrevocable-trust-v-united-states/" target="_blank">http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/marvin-m-brandt-irrevocable-trust-v-united-states/</a></p>
<p>Here is the SCOTUSblog coverage of this case: <a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/marvin-m-brandt-irrevocable-trust-v-united-states/" target="_blank">http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/marvin-m-brandt-irrevocable-trust-v-united-states/</a></p>