Red Lights for Bikes: Sure Thing or Stupid Nuisance? Tawlk amongst yourselves!
ON WBEZ's 848 this morning, Tony Sarabia chatted with Transportation Commissioner Gabe Klein about Chicago’s newest protected bike lane that will run along Dearborn Street in the Loop and will include red lights for bikes. More details here!
Tags: Bike, Cars, Lanes, Lights, Stop, Traffic, bicycles
Views: 1389
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by spencewine on -
Assuming that the red lights will be placed where there are already red lights....it seems like a bit of a waste. Cyclist who ignore them, will probably continue to ignore them and cyclist who heed them, will probably continue to heed them.
-
Permalink Reply by Liz on -
"The new protected lane on Dearborn will have bicycle signals. Bikes also will have to halt when motorized traffic when gets a right turn arrow, which prevents turning cars from hitting cyclists."
I've always thought that turning arrows should be used more around the city, especially in the loop. It would greatly reduce pedestrian conflict and gridlock.
It seems to me common sense to yield to traffic with a light, especially in the loop. When I run a red its only when there is no approaching traffic. A red light never physically stopped anybody, and unfortunately people who don't think safety is important will continue to ignore signals.
-
Permalink Reply by in it to win it 8.0 mi on -
If nothing else, will provide an interesting experiment.
-
Permalink Reply by Michelle Stenzel on -
The Dearborn PBL will definitely be two-way for bikes, while Dearborn is of course, one way for cars. I'm pretty sure the PBL will be on the left side of Dearborn, given that there are about 7 bus routes that run on the right side of the street. So there will have to be a red signal for all bikes while Dearborn drivers are given a green left turn arrow. During that green left for drivers, bicyclists will basically be expected to act like pedestrians, and allow the car traffic to turn until the arrow is red again. Of course, some bicyclists might try to ignore that, just as some pedestrians do currently when drivers are given a green right turn arrow (i.e on State St turning onto Washington), but I think it will be the exception.
Also, why is everyone calling these "Red Lights for Bikes"? They will have yellow and green phases, too, and their purpose is to help lessen confusion for all street users, and encourage bicycling. I suggest we refer to them as "Green Lights for Bikes".
-
Permalink Reply by Gene Tenner on
-
After the bike lane lights this is the plan for the Lakefront Trail.
-
Permalink Reply by Cameron 7.5 mi on -
I'm cautiously optimistic about the Dearborn protected lane. I've been critical of the Kinzie protected lane because of the intersection conflicts created for all modes of travel with turning traffic not looking for cyclists (or struggling with the poor sight lines), cyclists ignoring stop signs and not letting pedestrians cross, and pedestrians queuing in the bike lane waiting for a light to change. Hopefully the separate lights for the bike lane will be used to time the light cycles to eliminate some of these conflicts and give everyone a chance to move. This is very common in Germany and the Netherlands and works well there.
-
Permalink Reply by Duppie 13.5185km on -
How about we call them bicyclist traffic light, just there are pedestrian traffic lights?
Michelle Stenzel said:The Dearborn PBL will definitely be two-way for bikes, while Dearborn is of course, one way for cars. I'm pretty sure the PBL will be on the left side of Dearborn, given that there are about 7 bus routes that run on the right side of the street. So there will have to be a red signal for all bikes while Dearborn drivers are given a green left turn arrow. During that green left for drivers, bicyclists will basically be expected to act like pedestrians, and allow the car traffic to turn until the arrow is red again. Of course, some bicyclists might try to ignore that, just as some pedestrians do currently when drivers are given a green right turn arrow (i.e on State St turning onto Washington), but I think it will be the exception.
Also, why is everyone calling these "Red Lights for Bikes"? They will have yellow and green phases, too, and their purpose is to help lessen confusion for all street users, and encourage bicycling. I suggest we refer to them as "Green Lights for Bikes".
-
Permalink Reply by Jeff Schneider on -
I think most cyclists will obey the bicycle signals. What we have now is a situation where our infrastructure normally makes no provision for bicycles, encouraging a wild-west, every-man-for-himself, make-up-the-rules-as-I-go riding style. I'll bet most of us will be flattered to be recognized as legitimate users of the road, and that our behavior will reflect this.
-
Permalink Reply by Barry Aldridge on -
All of these new initiatives - bike stop lights, protected bike lanes - will take a while for drivers and cyclists to get used to, but you have to start somewhere. Over 10 years ago Mayor Daley added the first painted bike lanes and drivers (and cyclists) didn't seem to know how to treat them. Now, after years of experience, I think the bike lanes and cyclists are an accepted part of the street. If only the city would keep the lanes painted and cyclists would stay in them.
-
Permalink Reply by James BlackHeron on -
Registering your bike with a license plate will be next. A small fee to cover "costs" -just like for car licenses...
© 2008-2013 The Chainlink Community, L.L.C. Julie Hochstadter, Director
Powered by
