The Chainlink

http://www.rrstar.com/news/x946749027/New-state-law-targets-excessi...

I don't expect to see this enforced in Chicago. It would be great though if this was used on Archer Avenue. The wide highway like feel of much of Archer encourages speeding it seems. The speed limit is 25 or 30 at least east of Western. It would not be difficult to nab dozens of drivers a day doing 50 or 55 on some sections of Archer.

Views: 282

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

So as of July 1, anyone caught speeding more than 30 miles an hour above the posted speed limit on highways or 25 mph over or more in urban areas will not be able to walk out of the courtroom with a slap on the wrist as in court supervision.



So does anyone know what the actual consequence is?  I find it mind-boggling that people are ever permitted to legally be behind the wheel of a car again after they kill someone.

I tried to read the actual bill and my eyes glazed over. 

 

Here is another piece about it from http://www.nbcchicago.com/blogs/ward-room/Quinn-Passes-Law-to-Fight... - not much more detail - but it seems like the new law just removes the option of Court Supervision as a penalty.

This one from the Trib seems to clarify it a bit. Also interesting to note that Quinn also signed a bill outlawing cell phone use by commercial drivers. Does that include taxi drivers I wonder?

h' 1.0 said:

So as of July 1, anyone caught speeding more than 30 miles an hour above the posted speed limit on highways or 25 mph over or more in urban areas will not be able to walk out of the courtroom with a slap on the wrist as in court supervision.

So does anyone know what the actual consequence is?  I find it mind-boggling that people are ever permitted to legally be behind the wheel of a car again after they kill someone.

In California, they have a "reckless driving" statute, which kicks in (I think) at 30mph above the speed limit.  I'm surprised Illinois hadn't had something similar before now.

The law prohibits a judge from giving a defendant supervision rather than a conviction when the defendant pleads guilty to traveling more than 40 miles per hour over the posted speed limit on a highway or more than 25 miles per hour over the posted speed limit in an urban district.  It means that a conviction goes on the driver's record.  It does not mean the driver goes to jail. 

It is still possible for the city attorney or the state's attorney to downgrade the charge which would allow for the possibility of supervision.

I believe it's a misdemeanor to driver more than 40mph over the limit. Not sure if the charge is reckless driving but they can place you under arrest. 

Skip Montanaro 12mi said:

In California, they have a "reckless driving" statute, which kicks in (I think) at 30mph above the speed limit.  I'm surprised Illinois hadn't had something similar before now.

It is a Class A misdemeanor to drive more than 40 mph over the limit.  It is a Class B misdemeanor to driver 31 to 40 over the limit.  Either could be evidence of reckless driving, but reckless driving is a different charge.  Class A misdemeanors can result in imprisonment up to 364 days.  Class B misdemeanors can result in imprisonment for not more than 6 months.

A misdemeanor charge is a criminal charge, unlike a charge for violating most traffic laws.

Illinois has one.  I know I always would worry about it when I used to drive down to Peoria every week back in 2000-2002.  Some parts of I-55 are very dull.

Skip Montanaro 12mi said:

In California, they have a "reckless driving" statute, which kicks in (I think) at 30mph above the speed limit.  I'm surprised Illinois hadn't had something similar before now.

RSS

© 2008-2016   The Chainlink Community, L.L.C.   Powered by

Disclaimer  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service